gc_dreamer_485
10-13 11:45 AM
Guys,
Finally my problem and my questions are solved.
I drove up to the Canadian Border near Niagara Falls (Buffalo), they Canaidan Border Officials took my I-94. I took a drive in canada for 10 minutes. I even stopped at spot to view the Niagara Falls from Canadian side and drove back into US. I was issued a new I-94 with out any additional interogation.
What surprised me was my Canadian Visa expired on 09/01/2007 and i was still allowed to enter into Canada.
Anyways Thank you guys for all your responses.
I am kind of relieved related to my issue related to I-94.
GC_DREAMER_485
Finally my problem and my questions are solved.
I drove up to the Canadian Border near Niagara Falls (Buffalo), they Canaidan Border Officials took my I-94. I took a drive in canada for 10 minutes. I even stopped at spot to view the Niagara Falls from Canadian side and drove back into US. I was issued a new I-94 with out any additional interogation.
What surprised me was my Canadian Visa expired on 09/01/2007 and i was still allowed to enter into Canada.
Anyways Thank you guys for all your responses.
I am kind of relieved related to my issue related to I-94.
GC_DREAMER_485
wallpaper 4 reactor at the Chernobyl
ys2jax
07-03 08:42 AM
keep forwarding this news in email, so that we make this the most emailed news and it will show up on top of the page in yahoo for most emailed news.
Another link:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070703/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/immigration_green_cards
Another link:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070703/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/immigration_green_cards
kode
12-30 12:59 PM
lost .. yours isn't bad either
but yes .. soul's entry is simply awesome. all those details .. the colors ... you gotta love it!!
but yes .. soul's entry is simply awesome. all those details .. the colors ... you gotta love it!!
2011 to the Chernobyl disaster
mrsr
03-03 10:12 PM
thank you for your update
more...
rxsimha
03-18 03:13 PM
So does that mean that if one's I-485 is rejected (Has no luck with MTR either) -
Then he cannot continue after his current H1-B expires (After 0 to 3 years)?
Going back to his home country is the only option?
Then he cannot continue after his current H1-B expires (After 0 to 3 years)?
Going back to his home country is the only option?
same_old_guy
10-23 05:47 PM
Mine was EB2 at NSC. My I-140 RD is May 16 and got cleared on 18th Oct. Last thing I heard they are processing May last week now.
more...
jkamel5
07-11 12:55 PM
Thanks for advice. Yes my last M.Sc. and Ph.D. from the USA.
Could you please clarify what "find out NIW holders in your / related engg field"? How can I find out?
Do you believe EB2-NIW is easier than EB1-OR?
Thank you,
John
Your situation is slightly different than many I have come across. If your qualifications, research work, project etc have unique qualities, then you may still have a fighting chance. But you may have to do a lot of homework: find out NIW holders in your / related engg field, ask a few lawyers: do not believe right away if somebody promises they could, try to enroll in as many professional associations as possible, enlarge your skill portfolio etc.
BTW, is any degree of you from US?
Could you please clarify what "find out NIW holders in your / related engg field"? How can I find out?
Do you believe EB2-NIW is easier than EB1-OR?
Thank you,
John
Your situation is slightly different than many I have come across. If your qualifications, research work, project etc have unique qualities, then you may still have a fighting chance. But you may have to do a lot of homework: find out NIW holders in your / related engg field, ask a few lawyers: do not believe right away if somebody promises they could, try to enroll in as many professional associations as possible, enlarge your skill portfolio etc.
BTW, is any degree of you from US?
2010 the Chernobyl disaster.
breddy2000
01-06 10:14 AM
Can anyone pls respond to my situation. Thanks...
Today I received RFE for my H1 Extension.
I received only one RFE which is obtaining contract documents from the chain .
Here is my situation.
I work for Client A for whom Company B does the project work. I was contracted through Company C who is the prime vendor for Company B.
Here is the chain.. My Company --> Company C --> Company B --> Client A.
RFE states that my company need to provide contract documents within the entire chain which is highly unlikely they can obtain.
Company B and Company C can only provide letters to affirm that that I work for Client A. Will this be enough or does it need to be only a Contract document?
Below are my questions
==================
1.) My company says that they have PO from Company C which provides details about the entire chain. Will this be enough to answer the RFE?
2.) Does withdrawing H1 extension cause any problems ? I can invoke EAD
3.)Also Company B is willing to take me fulltime, so essentially if I abaondon H1 extension and join Company B , will this help or cause any more problems?
Thanks and appreciate your response.
Today I received RFE for my H1 Extension.
I received only one RFE which is obtaining contract documents from the chain .
Here is my situation.
I work for Client A for whom Company B does the project work. I was contracted through Company C who is the prime vendor for Company B.
Here is the chain.. My Company --> Company C --> Company B --> Client A.
RFE states that my company need to provide contract documents within the entire chain which is highly unlikely they can obtain.
Company B and Company C can only provide letters to affirm that that I work for Client A. Will this be enough or does it need to be only a Contract document?
Below are my questions
==================
1.) My company says that they have PO from Company C which provides details about the entire chain. Will this be enough to answer the RFE?
2.) Does withdrawing H1 extension cause any problems ? I can invoke EAD
3.)Also Company B is willing to take me fulltime, so essentially if I abaondon H1 extension and join Company B , will this help or cause any more problems?
Thanks and appreciate your response.
more...
LostInGCProcess
05-05 02:44 AM
Update:
The Doctor admitted his mistake.
He completely forgot to mark the TB test earlier.
He was ready to back date to avoid more inconveniance to me.
But I told him to be sincere in all aspects.
I basically forced him to give my wife a TB test again and also the x-ray.
Now the plan is to submit all this information with a nice letter which states that the doctor had forgotten things last time etc etc.
Hopefully they will mark the case as - resume processing.
If I were you, I would not have gone with the repeat of X-ray test unless it was absolutely necessary. X-ray are very harmful to the human cells and tissues. It was a ( Probably honest) mistake by the doctor who was going to give the correct report...and you forced him to take the x-ray again!! hmmmmm....I have nothing more to say.
The Doctor admitted his mistake.
He completely forgot to mark the TB test earlier.
He was ready to back date to avoid more inconveniance to me.
But I told him to be sincere in all aspects.
I basically forced him to give my wife a TB test again and also the x-ray.
Now the plan is to submit all this information with a nice letter which states that the doctor had forgotten things last time etc etc.
Hopefully they will mark the case as - resume processing.
If I were you, I would not have gone with the repeat of X-ray test unless it was absolutely necessary. X-ray are very harmful to the human cells and tissues. It was a ( Probably honest) mistake by the doctor who was going to give the correct report...and you forced him to take the x-ray again!! hmmmmm....I have nothing more to say.
hair Film about Chernobyl disaster
uma001
02-08 11:45 AM
One of friends got advice from a tax consultant about the 401K withdrawal question you have. The best approach in this case would be to phase out the withdrawal amounts over a period of successive years. When you are in India, you are not earning US income. So say if you take 10K the first year, it will be considered income earned in US for which you have to pay tax. Since 10K is below the standard deduction amt, you will not have to pay any tax. The penalty will still apply as you are breaking the 401K.
Disclaimer - Talk to a tax professional.
Thanks
You mean Rs10000?? :)
Disclaimer - Talk to a tax professional.
Thanks
You mean Rs10000?? :)
more...
rkdownload
01-23 10:30 PM
Received the following RFE on H1B Extension.
1. copies of signed contracts between the petitioner and XXX (my name)
2. a complete itinery of services or engagements that specifies the dates of each service or engagement, the names and addresses of the actual employers, and the names and address of the establishment, venues, or locations where the services will be performed for the period of time request; and
3. copies of signed contractual agreements, statements of work, work orders, service agreements, and letter between the petitioner and the authorised officials of the ultimate end-client companies where the work will actually be performed that specifically list XXX (my name) on the contracts and provides a detailed description of the duties the beneficiary will perform, the qualifications that are required to perform the job duties, salary or wage paid, hours worked, benefits, a brief description of who will supervise the beneficiary and their duties, and any other related evidence.
NOTE: The evidence must show speciality occupation work for the beneficiary with the actual end-client company where the work will ultimately be performed. Merely providing contracts between the petitioner, through any other consultaants or staffing agencies, to an ultimate end-client.
My employer is a small consulting company for whom I work on corp-to-corp positions. Now my employer is saying that he cannot reply this RFE and asked me to work on EAD. I would like him to atleast reply the RFE. Any advise in this direction would be highly appreciated. Need to reply by Jan 29.
1. copies of signed contracts between the petitioner and XXX (my name)
2. a complete itinery of services or engagements that specifies the dates of each service or engagement, the names and addresses of the actual employers, and the names and address of the establishment, venues, or locations where the services will be performed for the period of time request; and
3. copies of signed contractual agreements, statements of work, work orders, service agreements, and letter between the petitioner and the authorised officials of the ultimate end-client companies where the work will actually be performed that specifically list XXX (my name) on the contracts and provides a detailed description of the duties the beneficiary will perform, the qualifications that are required to perform the job duties, salary or wage paid, hours worked, benefits, a brief description of who will supervise the beneficiary and their duties, and any other related evidence.
NOTE: The evidence must show speciality occupation work for the beneficiary with the actual end-client company where the work will ultimately be performed. Merely providing contracts between the petitioner, through any other consultaants or staffing agencies, to an ultimate end-client.
My employer is a small consulting company for whom I work on corp-to-corp positions. Now my employer is saying that he cannot reply this RFE and asked me to work on EAD. I would like him to atleast reply the RFE. Any advise in this direction would be highly appreciated. Need to reply by Jan 29.
hot Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster
vactorboy29
03-03 03:56 PM
At what stage will my current job description be matched to the Job description in my Labor or I-140?
My I-140 is approved foralmost a year now and I had enquired with USCIS a few month ago and they told me my Name check has also been cleared and my case is just waiting I-485 adjudication when visa numebrs are available. I thought when my Priority date becomes current, I will get my GC seamlessly unless there is an RFE.
Also, is there any documentation that states 50% job description match? This is the first time i'm hearing this criteria. I do understand that if I work as Mechanical engineer, I should not chnage my job to a Software engineer...but will getting a Mechanical Engineering job in a totally different industry be a problem?
Thanks again for your time.
Once you invoke AC21 .You may get rfe where your new employment detail will be verify by adjudicator assigned to your case against Perm application. This is very subjective matter depends and how uscis handle your case. I think 50 % matching requirement is not written any where, it is just common practice .No one can expect us to match 100 % job requirement with old labor petition.
Mostly watch for your EB2 requirement with your job description. Here is the DOL web site link which talks about job description comes under that code.
http://www.onetcodeconnector.org/ccreport/17-2141.00
My I-140 is approved foralmost a year now and I had enquired with USCIS a few month ago and they told me my Name check has also been cleared and my case is just waiting I-485 adjudication when visa numebrs are available. I thought when my Priority date becomes current, I will get my GC seamlessly unless there is an RFE.
Also, is there any documentation that states 50% job description match? This is the first time i'm hearing this criteria. I do understand that if I work as Mechanical engineer, I should not chnage my job to a Software engineer...but will getting a Mechanical Engineering job in a totally different industry be a problem?
Thanks again for your time.
Once you invoke AC21 .You may get rfe where your new employment detail will be verify by adjudicator assigned to your case against Perm application. This is very subjective matter depends and how uscis handle your case. I think 50 % matching requirement is not written any where, it is just common practice .No one can expect us to match 100 % job requirement with old labor petition.
Mostly watch for your EB2 requirement with your job description. Here is the DOL web site link which talks about job description comes under that code.
http://www.onetcodeconnector.org/ccreport/17-2141.00
more...
house the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear
h1techSlave
04-04 04:10 PM
Agree with you 100%. And this does not require a law change and is relatively easy. Not very easy, but easier than getting a new law passed.
I saw a comment on a lawyer's website that recapture of unused visas can only be done through legislation and not through administrative fix..
And, the real issue we should try to address here is USCIS inefficiency.
There are a lot of " worldwide" category folks who have been current for over a year (and a few months after the 180 day memo) but are yet to get their GC.... So unless we get USCIS to move fast on the applications that are current, all our visa recapture efforts help DOS to move cut off dates further ahead.. but if past history is any indication, more of these visa #s will be assigned to Consular processing cases rather than AOS cases in USA..
So.. I think while lobbying for Visa Recapture is the right move, we should also lobby to highlight USCIS inefficiency in adjudicating cases that are current..
I saw a comment on a lawyer's website that recapture of unused visas can only be done through legislation and not through administrative fix..
And, the real issue we should try to address here is USCIS inefficiency.
There are a lot of " worldwide" category folks who have been current for over a year (and a few months after the 180 day memo) but are yet to get their GC.... So unless we get USCIS to move fast on the applications that are current, all our visa recapture efforts help DOS to move cut off dates further ahead.. but if past history is any indication, more of these visa #s will be assigned to Consular processing cases rather than AOS cases in USA..
So.. I think while lobbying for Visa Recapture is the right move, we should also lobby to highlight USCIS inefficiency in adjudicating cases that are current..
tattoo April 26, 1986, Chernobyl (HDR
mzdial
June 13th, 2004, 12:59 AM
Not to throw more rocks into the gears here.. But unless the S2 has been updated (which I don't follow really), it was using the chip that was in the Nikon D1 I believe?
If that is such the case, ISO800 is noisy and you can't really shoot above that.
Disregard this if it is newer tech and I'm completely off base.
-- Matt
If that is such the case, ISO800 is noisy and you can't really shoot above that.
Disregard this if it is newer tech and I'm completely off base.
-- Matt
more...
pictures The Chernobyl nuclear accident
StarSun
08-16 08:22 AM
Members, please note that IV is bringing back the Conference Call with Attorney Prashanthi Reddy. Please note that participation from our members will allow us to continue this program on a regular basis.
Please post your questions as well as be on the conference call to ask and follow up with the attorney.
Please post your questions as well as be on the conference call to ask and follow up with the attorney.
dresses chernobyl disaster in ukraine
WAIT_FOR_EVER_GC
11-07 03:49 PM
My Friend your thoughts are very good.
The AC21 Letter that one sends after changing a job is not a gaurantee that it is attached to your file(I-485). how do you expect to explain all that you are saying to CIS when they can't do there own work properly.
minimalist, thanks for sharing your views. As I said, I am a layman and do not know all the details. appreciate your input.
In this case, once an official request for AC21 is filed, CIS can release that particular employer from all liabilities for this 'AC21ed' 140. Since new employer is not required to show any financial statement (in case of EAD), this may be a good option.
The AC21 Letter that one sends after changing a job is not a gaurantee that it is attached to your file(I-485). how do you expect to explain all that you are saying to CIS when they can't do there own work properly.
minimalist, thanks for sharing your views. As I said, I am a layman and do not know all the details. appreciate your input.
In this case, once an official request for AC21 is filed, CIS can release that particular employer from all liabilities for this 'AC21ed' 140. Since new employer is not required to show any financial statement (in case of EAD), this may be a good option.
more...
makeup Chernobyl Disaster (1986)
PD_Dec2002
03-20 07:29 AM
according to you, it means he is really disappointing or annoying to just read one bill and conclude everything....
gceb1:
Are you kidding me with your posts? I can't decide whether to feel sorry for you or get angry with you. But I guess, I will move on since you obviously have issues to deal with...green card should be the least of your priorities!
My "bummer" post was specifically in response to WAIT_FOR_EVER_GC and whitecollarslave's posts about Masters in STEM. I read all the three bills and I stand by my statement that Masters in STEM are exempt ONLY from the H-1B cap; not the EB cap. (line 14 on page 2 of H.R. 5630 (http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h5630ih.txt.pdf).) It is only the PhDs who are exempt from the EB cap.
Before you start throwing "smart alecky" comments at others, please let me know where it explicitly says otherwise. Don't show me anything about PhDs; ONLY Masters and EB caps.
I (and probably others too) thought this was the STEM bill being reintroduced which deals with EB caps. But it is not, hence the disappointment.
Regards,
Jayant
P.S.: I know you are going to be back to read this thread. So a lack of response from you will be sufficient for me to have proven my case. But an apology for casting aspersions wouldn't hurt......naah, just kidding! :-) You have a lot of growing up to do, so run along.
gceb1:
Are you kidding me with your posts? I can't decide whether to feel sorry for you or get angry with you. But I guess, I will move on since you obviously have issues to deal with...green card should be the least of your priorities!
My "bummer" post was specifically in response to WAIT_FOR_EVER_GC and whitecollarslave's posts about Masters in STEM. I read all the three bills and I stand by my statement that Masters in STEM are exempt ONLY from the H-1B cap; not the EB cap. (line 14 on page 2 of H.R. 5630 (http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h5630ih.txt.pdf).) It is only the PhDs who are exempt from the EB cap.
Before you start throwing "smart alecky" comments at others, please let me know where it explicitly says otherwise. Don't show me anything about PhDs; ONLY Masters and EB caps.
I (and probably others too) thought this was the STEM bill being reintroduced which deals with EB caps. But it is not, hence the disappointment.
Regards,
Jayant
P.S.: I know you are going to be back to read this thread. So a lack of response from you will be sufficient for me to have proven my case. But an apology for casting aspersions wouldn't hurt......naah, just kidding! :-) You have a lot of growing up to do, so run along.
girlfriend 1986 Chernobyl
gc_in_30_yrs
10-03 11:38 AM
you might also need a copy of your approved Labour application.
I am not sure if you can get the documents directly from the UCIS becuase the documents belong to your employer and not you.
you can try through Freedom of Information Act(foia.com). but it might take a while to get the documents.
All that is required is only I-140 Approval Notice. Labor Cert is not required.
I am not sure if you can get the documents directly from the UCIS becuase the documents belong to your employer and not you.
you can try through Freedom of Information Act(foia.com). but it might take a while to get the documents.
All that is required is only I-140 Approval Notice. Labor Cert is not required.
hairstyles 1986 Chernobyl disaster,
gc_dreamer_485
10-16 08:32 AM
I have a similar question. I have I-94 till Jan 2008 as my H1B visa is valid till Jan 2008. If I file an H1B extension in Dec, is that okay ? I know, approval would not come before Jan 08.
Thanks Andy_garcia.
PD_RECAPTURING,
As long as you have new 797 (which would have the I-94 on it) when you leave the country, you will be fine
Thanks Andy_garcia.
PD_RECAPTURING,
As long as you have new 797 (which would have the I-94 on it) when you leave the country, you will be fine
crystal
10-04 11:50 AM
yes
Does the AP notice have a photo on it?
Does the AP notice have a photo on it?
Munna Bhai
02-08 10:01 AM
It typically comes after 12 of every month.
It comes 12th of every month but it is always good to see after 12 months(1year)...
It comes 12th of every month but it is always good to see after 12 months(1year)...
No comments:
Post a Comment